<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>More Than Scratch The Surface &#187; web 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scratch99.com/tag/web-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scratch99.com</link>
	<description>A Journey In Web Development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2012 12:52:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Amazing Results &#8211; Optimising Image Size Using Smush.it</title>
		<link>http://scratch99.com/web-development/optimisation/smushit-optimizing-images-for-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://scratch99.com/web-development/optimisation/smushit-optimizing-images-for-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Cronin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web Page Optimisation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Development]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scratch99.com/2008/10/smushit-amazing-results-optimizing-images-for-the-web/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are dozens of new web based applications being launched every day. Most are moderately useful, but it&#8217;s rare that I actually need to use one. After playing with them for a while, I normally abandon them and go back to the core tools I use to get things done. Well, I found one that&#8217;s [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are dozens of new web based applications being launched every day. Most are moderately useful, but it&#8217;s rare that I actually <b>need</b> to use one. After playing with them for a while, I normally abandon them and go back to the core tools I use to get things done. </p>
<p>Well, I found one that&#8217;s going right into my toolset: <a href="http://www.smushit.com/ysmush.it/" target="_blank">smush.it</a>, the image optimisation web application.</p>
<p> &#8230; [<a href="http://scratch99.com/web-development/optimisation/smushit-optimizing-images-for-the-web/">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scratch99.com/web-development/optimisation/smushit-optimizing-images-for-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>57</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WPVote Needs To Improve Published News Section</title>
		<link>http://scratch99.com/wordpress/opinion/wpvote-needs-to-improve-published-news-section/</link>
		<comments>http://scratch99.com/wordpress/opinion/wpvote-needs-to-improve-published-news-section/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2008 12:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Cronin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[WordPress Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WordPress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.scratch99.com/2008/08/wpvote-needs-to-improve-published-news-section/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For those of you who don&#8217;t know, there&#8217;s a new social news site for WordPress, called WPVote. I&#8217;ve been using the site for a couple of days and while the concept is great, the quality of entries are poor at this early stage. &#8230; [visit site to read more]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those of you who don&#8217;t know, there&#8217;s a new <strong>social news site for WordPress</strong>, called <a href="http://wpvote.com/"><strong>WPVote</strong></a>. I&#8217;ve been using the site for a couple of days and while the concept is great, the quality of entries are poor at this early stage. &#8230; [<a href="http://scratch99.com/wordpress/opinion/wpvote-needs-to-improve-published-news-section/">visit site to read more</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scratch99.com/wordpress/opinion/wpvote-needs-to-improve-published-news-section/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>20</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced

Served from: scratch99.com @ 2012-05-23 04:37:23 -->
